By Elvin Herrera

Mathematics has been a total different language for children
to learn. The reason relapses on its content where students find symbols that
represent operations, a not conventional way to get involved in knowledge.
Thereby, students find mathematics intimidating, difficult to understand and
most difficult to master which makes a challenge for the teacher in the
teaching environment. As a response to this situation the National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000)
invites teachers to imagine the classroom, a school or a school district where
all students have access to high quality, engaging mathematics instruction
through some principles and standards that NCTM consider a guidance for the
process of teaching mathematics in the classroom . In this way, the first thing
to account for teaching math in elementary school should be the motivation;
children need be motivated to do well according to the mathematics curriculum,
this is part of the styles diversity of learning. Each student learns in
different ways and that is the reason why teachers find around the classroom
some hurdles with their students at the moment to learn math. Some of these
students seem able to develop in math situations but others not. Therefore, it
does not mean that those students have problems to learn math, it is that they
just have learning differences. To address these learning differences of the
pupils, it is important for them to have a variety of materials to dominate the
mathematical knowledge in multiples ways of learning which oriented students to
develop constructive or active activities. “In order to have opportunities
to learn math, children need firsthand experiences related to math, interaction
with other children and adults concerning these experiences and time to reflect
on the experiences” (Carol Seefeldt, 2006).
Consequently, the issue to reflect about teaching math is in comprehending the
learning of it as a construction of the students regarding to their own
mathematical understanding. Teaching mathematics involves a process of handling
standards and principles for the teacher to be applied in students in order to
feel with math an importance in the school and in society itself looking for continuity
in the process.
The National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (2000) have worked
on finding some directions for orienting the mathematics education. The standards are intended as a policy
document for professionals in mathematics education as well as a vision of excellence, one which attempts to move
the field well beyond the minimal
competencies of the back-to-basic movement of the 1980s (Bishop, 1990). This
document is a condensed result of hard investigations about what should be a
real reform in teaching mathematics. Some aspects of the standards of NCTM are
focus on achieving a higher performance in students following the requirements
that modern education asks for students of the new era. Also, an important aim
traced is having a greater emphasis on conceptual understanding at the moment
to solve problems toward cases that involve situations of real life.
Specifically, a greater emphasis on conceptual understanding and having
students solve longer, less well-defined problems. NCTM (2000) identified some principles for school mathematics which are
around of the equity of excellence in math, the curriculum, the teaching and
learning strategies, the assessment to support the learning and the technology
as an improvement for student’s learning. The objective of these principles is
providing teachers important information about the features of high-quality
mathematics instruction.
Motivating students to be a fundamental part of the
process of teaching math is one of the most important aspects to account.
Teachers should always focus attention on the students who present no interest
as well as the motivated ones. The motivation determines how much the pupil
learns and how much pleasant he or she feels with it. Accordingly, motivating
students to achieve a success in mathematics learning is a challenge to the
teacher and it should be a main concern in the process. Therefore, this situation
involves to teachers to work more individually with their students in order to
concrete a total learning in the classroom. As Ediger (2003) says, each pupil is important and no one should fall through
the slats in mathematics. For keeping this stability in students, teachers need
to determine knowledge and skills in students and in this way to acquire the
mathematical background that sustains a success in the process. Thus, pupils
need to be motivated to do the best in the mathematics area which is very
important for the curriculum and it current seems to be separated from the
others areas of knowledge.
An integration of the
other areas of learning could help math to be less independent but it is just
an illusion that only the teacher can create in the classroom. Accordingly,
creativity should be an important element integrated in math teachers. Ufuktepe
and Ozel (2002) suggest the integration of music and drama with concrete
manipulatives. He believes that the employment of music and drama with
traditional mathematical instruction not only reduced math anxiety but also
improved student performance on unit tests. The use of these techniques, music
and drama, could help to achieve a major activity in the learning. Despite of
the difficulty of integrating motivational methods for teaching math, teachers
never have to forget that human senses are the responsible for catching
everything knowledge available around. At this point, the advice made by these
authors is converting these senses of perception in strategies for acquiring
math successfully and at the same time, the practical approach of mathematics
is accomplished because it demands to the teachers to be pragmatics instead of
the traditional ones which do not still fill enough in this field of knowledge.
The weakness of almost all education systems is the lack of individually
attention for students. The process of teaching has been developed in a general
way without knowing that children individually are different from each other
and possess diverse learning styles. In the same way, they also show different
intelligences but this is something that teachers may ignore. For this reason,
Ediger (2003) observes that teachers and
supervisor need to study pupils in the classroom and know under which
conditions pupils achieve best in pertaining to the mathematics curriculum. Through
this study in the classroom, the teacher can start to work in teaching-
learning toward applying different strategies for each student according to
what he or she notices individually in the observations. In a general
perspective about learning styles, the problems that children present for
dealing mathematics are due to teachers are following a curriculum that is
directed to a loss of creativity for acquiring the mathematical knowledge; the
playful activity is not integrated in the classroom. Consequently, children
find mathematics intimidating and difficult to manage. Instead of this,
students should rather learn math in a practical way or in a proximal view to
the reality as the constructivist method says.
There are some materials to consider at the moment of teaching
mathematics. Bradley (2008) found some
primoridal elements as educational resources which can help a lot to guide the
process of teaching – learning mathematics. Firstly, Bradley identifies an
educative trinomial as the center of whatever process of education settled in
society, it is integrated by the student, the teacher and the parents. These
human resources for education have a great responsibility for keeping a
stability in the educative process. Of course, teaching mathematics also is
involved in these three elements as other learning areas do too. Morever, other
componets are formed by material
resources as thecnology, the phisycal space and didactic materials which are a
very important piece for integrating an active or practical class in teaching
math. In the same way, Bradley develop an integration of strategic elements such as logical thinking in the use
of intervention activities, using manipulatives and number lines during
whole-group instruction, focusing on explicit instruction with small-groups,
engaging students in partner learning and peer tutoring, integrating music,
videocassettes and computer software and working problems from the textbook.
Mathematics is one of the three important areas, along reading and writing,
which students must master during a process of education in elementary school. However,
this learning area seems a little difficult to possess for students due to the
lack of a curriculum that promotes a motivation for learning math. In such a
way, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics offers great proposals
that instructors can follow for getting in the students a high level of
mathematics; also looking for feeling an interest about mathematics and seeing the value and beauty of
it. Accordingly, teachers have to develop mathematical competences in
students because teaching math is a process for evolving pupils to a reality
that they must live. Creativity is an essential element in teaching so it
promotes an active participation of the students. Consequently, the integration
of tools or methods that allow students to be interested in learning math
should be an important piece to integrate in the pedagogical teaching agenda. The
opportunities of learning that the teacher offers to the students need to be
varied in order to accommodate each student to his own style of learning.
Following this principle, the most important aim for students is achieving
individual abilities for integrating with the social environment which demands
professionals in higher competitive availability on labor field.
Bibliography References
NCTM
(2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics.
Bishop,
Allan J. (1990). Mathematical power to the people. Harvard Educational
Review Vol 60 No. 3.
Bradley,
J. R. (2008). Teaching Mathematics to Elementary. (J. S. University, Ed.) Asian
Social Science.
Carol
Seefeldt, . A. (2006). Early education: three-, four-, and five-year-olds
go to. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Ediger,
M. (2003). Teaching Mathematics Successfully. New Delhi, India:
Discovery Publishing House.
Ünal
Ufuktepe, C. T. Ozel. (2002). Avoiding mathematics trauma: Alternative
teaching methods. Crete, Greece: Documents Reproduction Service No. ED477833.